spicedogs: (Photographer)
[personal profile] spicedogs
Without Flash:




With Flash:


Date: 2008-11-03 04:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] boheme06.livejournal.com
Yeah, it definitely depends on what you're trying to capture. I like the first one in this example.

Date: 2008-11-03 10:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spicedogs.livejournal.com
I like the first one, too. But it is interesting how the story that the photo captures changes with the flash.

Date: 2008-11-03 04:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miss-sophia.livejournal.com
I like the first one a lot. Sometimes hiding something makes the photo say much more.

Date: 2008-11-03 10:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spicedogs.livejournal.com
I definitely agree with you.

Date: 2008-11-03 04:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mr-henry-gale.livejournal.com
I've always had a fondness for pictures taken without flash. It's more naturalistic that way. There's more depth to it than the artificial brightness of pictures taken with flash.

Date: 2008-11-03 10:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spicedogs.livejournal.com
But sometimes you do need the flash. But in this case, I agree with you. The flash ruins the story.

Date: 2008-11-03 09:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ben-munchkin.livejournal.com
i agree the first one is better :)

Date: 2008-11-03 10:16 pm (UTC)

Date: 2008-11-03 04:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] greenleaf-y.livejournal.com
I like both pictures. The second picture is addition for the first (for me)

Date: 2008-11-03 10:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spicedogs.livejournal.com
I think the second clarifies what the photo is depicting. But the first one has a mysterious aura about it.

Profile

spicedogs: (Default)
spiecedogs

May 2009

S M T W T F S
      1 2
3 4 5 6789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 07:57 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios