What a Difference a Flash Makes

[spicedogs]

Without Flash:




With Flash:

Comments

[boheme06.livejournal.com]

Yeah, it definitely depends on what you're trying to capture. I like the first one in this example.

[miss-sophia.livejournal.com]

I like the first one a lot. Sometimes hiding something makes the photo say much more.

[mr-henry-gale.livejournal.com]

I've always had a fondness for pictures taken without flash. It's more naturalistic that way. There's more depth to it than the artificial brightness of pictures taken with flash.

[ben-munchkin.livejournal.com]

i agree the first one is better :)

[greenleaf-y.livejournal.com]

I like both pictures. The second picture is addition for the first (for me)

[spicedogs.livejournal.com]

I like the first one, too. But it is interesting how the story that the photo captures changes with the flash.

[spicedogs.livejournal.com]

I definitely agree with you.

[spicedogs.livejournal.com]

But sometimes you do need the flash. But in this case, I agree with you. The flash ruins the story.

[spicedogs.livejournal.com]

Me, too.

[spicedogs.livejournal.com]

I think the second clarifies what the photo is depicting. But the first one has a mysterious aura about it.